When it comes to more interactive and participatory live sessions, including basic hybrid sessions, students’ (and staff) views on recording are more complex. Given the value felt by students, staff are strongly encouraged to record staff-led presentation-style live classes where possible, using institutionally supported services, and to make recordings available to students through Moodle, unless the member of staff deems it inappropriate to do so. In addition, staff are preparing to deliver live or basic hybrid teaching - including engagement activities, seminars, discussion sessions and workshops and discussion sessions - using Zoom and Teams. Should these be recorded? Many colleagues have pre-recorded (some of) their lectures to be delivered asynchronously. Students greatly value recordings of lectures and other teaching activities both for the flexibility (being able to study at a time that suits their time zone, caring responsibilities, accommodating part-time work etc) and for the ability to review and revisit them for revision and clarification. It remains in place for 2022-23. An updated policy on recording of educational activities is planned following discussion and debate with stakeholders. This is guidance that was first issued for the 2020-21 academic year and slightly modified for the 2022-22 operating model. An argument for such an agreement would, I think, be an improvement in the general quality of such things.Interim guidance on recording of teaching during 2022-23 whilst an updated policy is in development. If a university wants to maintain a high quality faculty and keep them happy and productive, I think they would be willing to negotiate some sharing arrangement. I would prefer a different interpretation, of course, in which the law would recognize that the faculty is the university and derives all function and authority from the consent and participation of the faculty. It would be difficult, at best, to contest this view, I think. So, "your mileage may vary."Ībsent a formal agreement, the university will probably claim to own all rights including the rights to reuse such things in the future whether the faculty member is employed there or not and without additional compensation. Copyright law, however, is variable around the world and to some extent, so is the relationship between the faculty and the university. IANAL, but guess that the above is a pretty general interpretation. The university provides the infrastructure and the audience. The course materials were created by yourself, but at the direction of the employer. Lectures, however, like other explicit course materials, seem to be in a different category. And since there are other alternatives for teaching a course than writing your own book, it is normally an independent activity. ), but those are normally written at the full initiative of the author(s) rather than at the direction of the university. I don't think that universities (none in my experience) get in the way of a faculty member publishing books (or software. If faculty are employees of the university then most of the IP created can be claimed by the employer, just as if you were employed by IBM in a research capacity. You might be able to come to a royalty agreement, but I doubt much beyond that. If you, the faculty, want to retain any rights, I suggest that you (as a collective group negotiating with the administration) write them into a contract.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |